پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 163 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,878 |
| تعداد مقالات | 74,135 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 137,881,370 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 107,242,589 |
Examining Burton’s Stance on the Differences Among the Recitations of the Qur’ān | ||
| Classical and Contemporary Islamic Studies | ||
| دوره 8، شماره 1، فروردین 2026، صفحه 97-103 اصل مقاله (542.26 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Scholary | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcis.2025.401198.1440 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Hasan Reza’i Haftadoor* | ||
| Department of Qur’ān and Hadīth Sciences, Faculty of Theology, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, , Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Orientalists have conducted extensive studies on the reasons for differences among the Qur’ān recitation modes. One of these figures is John Burton, the British Qur’ān researcher. He believes the Qur’ān that exists today has been compiled during the lifetime of the Prophet (s) and by His Majesty. In his view, the topic of «recitation differences among the Companions’ copies of the Qur’ān» is a pretext to delete the Prophet’s (s) role in the compilation of the Qur’ān. That is, the topic of «recitation differences among the Companions’ copies of the Qur’ān» is not a reality. Rather, it was fabricated by some jurists who tried to use it in their debates with other jurists to support their jurisprudential decrees not supported by the current copy of the Qur’ān. If it were said that the Prophet (s) had compiled the qur’ānic verses as one copy of the Qur’ān, then those jurists could not suggest the recitation differences among the Companions’ copies. Thus, they concluded that if they fabricated some narrations, they could remove the role of the Prophet (s) in the compilation of the Qur’ān and present its compilation as something that happened after his demise. Despite some positive points in Burton’s theory, there exist some major criticisms against the principles of his theory. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| John Burton؛ Qur’ān recitation؛ Companions’ copies of the Qur’ān؛ jurisprudential decrees | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
The Holy Qur'ān.
Abbot, N. (1967), Studies in Arabic Literary Papyri II: Quranic commentary and tradition. The University of Chicago press.
Abū Ubayd, Q. (1994). Kitāb Faḍāʼil al-Qur'ān. Dār ibn Kathīr. (In Arabic)
ʻĀmilī, J.M. (n.d.). Ḥaqāʼiq Hāmma ḥawl al-Qur'ān al-Karīm. Al-Nashr al-Islāmī Foundation. (In Arabic)
Azami, M.M. (1996). on Schacht's origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. Oxford University Press.
Id., (1978). Studies in Early Hadith Literature. American trust Publications USA.
Bāqillānī, A. (n.d.). Nukat al-Intiṣār li-naql al-Qur'ān. Minshāt al-Maʻārif. (In Arabic)
Burton, J. (1977). the collection of the Quran. Cambridge University Press.
Id., (2001). Collection of the Qur'ān. Encylopaedia of the Qur'ān (J.D. Mcauliffe, Ed.). Brill. 351-361.
Darwaza, M.ʻI. (n.d.). al-Qur'ān al-Majīd. al-Maṭbaʻat al-ʻAṣrīyya. (In Arabic)
Fueck. J. (2004), The role of traditionalism in Islam. Hadith, Cromwell press. 3-26.
Horovitz, J. (2004). The Antigurty and origin of The Isnad. Hadith, Cromwell press. 151-158.
Ḥujjatī, M.B. (2005). Pazhūhishī dar Tārīkh Qur'ān Karīm. Islamic culture publishing office. (In Persian)
Ibn Ḥajar ʻAsqalānī, A. (2000). Fatḥ al-bārī bisharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Dār al‑Salām. (In Arabic)
Ibn Ḥanbal, A. (1995). al-Musnad. Dār al‑Ḥadīth. (In Arabic)
Ibn Ṭāwūs, ʻA. (1984). Saʻd al-Suʻūd. Manshūrāt al-Raḍī. (In Arabic)
Jaʻfarīyān, R. (1994). al-Qur'ān wa Daʻāwī al-Taḥrīf. Dār al-Thaqalayn. (In Arabic)
Khūyī, A. (2015). al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qur'ān. al-Maṭbaʻat al-ʻilmīyya. (In Arabic)
Madelung, W. (1979). review of the collection of the Quran. International Journal of middle East studies 3, 416-432.
Mīr Muḥammadī, A. (1979). Buḥūth fī Tārīkh al-Qur'ān wa ʻUlūmihī. Dār al-Taʻāruf al-Maṭbūʻāt. (In Arabic)
Motzki, H. (2001). the collection of the Quran: A Reconsideration of Western viewe in Light of Recent Methodological Development. Der Islam 78, 1-34.
Mūsawī, Sh. (1995). Ajwabat Masāʼil Jārullāh. al-Majmaʻ al-ʻĀlamī li-ʼhl al-Bayt. (In Arabic)
Rāmyār, M. (2001). Tārīkh Qur'ān. Amir Kabir Publications. (In Persian)
Riḍāyī Haftādur, Ḥ. (2020). Evaluation of Qur'anic opinions of some contemporary orientalists. Journal The Qur’an from Orientalists Point of View, 29(15), 294-318. (In Persian). https://qkh.journals.miu.ac.ir/
Robson, J. (2004). The isnad in Muslim tradition. Hadith, Cromwell press. 163-174.
Ṣanʻānī, ʻA. (1990). Tafsīr al-Qur'ān al-ʻAzīz. Dār al-Kutub. (In Arabic)
Schoeler, G. (2004). oral torah and hadith: transmission «Prohibition of Writing» Redaction. Hadith, Cromwell press. 67-108.
Sezgin, F. (2001). Tārīkh Nigārish hāyi ʻArabī (M. Arzandi and Sh. Shādfar, Ed.). Printing and Publishing Organization of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance.
Ṭabrisī, F. (1994). Majmaʿ al-bayān fī tafsīr al-Qur’ān. Muʾassisat al-Aʻlamī lil Maṭbūʾāt. (In Arabic)
Ṭayālisī, A. (1903). Musnad al-Ṭayālisī. n.p. (In Arabic)
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 20 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 20 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب