ضرورت جعل شخصیت حقوقی هوشمند برای هوش مصنوعی و چارچوب‌های حقوقی آن

منابع

امین، سیدعلیرضا (1400). درآمدی بر نظریۀ شخصیت حقوقی در فقه امامیه. تمدن حقوقی، 4(9)،DOI:10.22034/lc.2022.141396،

پاسبان، محمدرضا (1401). حقوق تجارت: اشخاص حقوقی و شرکت‌های تجاری. ج۲، تهران: گنج دانش.

جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفر (1396). وصیت. تهران: گنج دانش.

جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفر (1401). ترمینولوژی حقوق. چ سی‌وششم، تهران: گنج دانش.

حقیقت، امین؛ سوری، علیرضا (1399). حقوق تجارت در پرتو نظام حقوقی کنونی. چ دوم، تهران: چتر دانش.

حلی، ابن‌ادریس (1410ق). سرائر. ج ۶، قم.

رهبر، نوید؛ دهقان‌پور فراشاه، سبحان (1400). بررسی تطبیقی مبنای مسئولیت مدنی در تصادفات وسایل نقلیۀ خودران. حقوق تطبیقی، 12(2)، DOI:10.22059/jcl.2021.320449.634169،

دادمرزی، سیدمهدی (1394). امکان‌سنجی پذیرش نظریۀ شخصیت حقوقی خانواده در حقوق ایران، کشورهای اسلامی، غرب و فقه اسلام. پژوهش‌های حقوق تطبیقی، 19(3)، DOI:20.1001.1.22516751.1394.19.3.3.0،

شریفی، سیدالهام‌الدین؛ بیرمی، گلناز (1397). ماهیت حقوقی نمایندگان هوشمند در عرصۀ قراردادهای الکترونیکی. پژوهش‌های حقوقی، ۱۷(33)، DOI:10.48300/jlr.2018.65509،

شهید اول (782ق). لمعه دمشقیه. ترجمۀ شیروانی، علی و غرویان، محسن (1394). ج1، چ پنجاه‌وسوم، قم: دارالفکر.

طباطبایی یزدی، سیدمحمدکاظم (۱۴۰۰ق). ملحقات عروه‌الوثقی. ج۲، قم: مکتبة الداوری.

عمید، حسن (1369). فرهنگ فارسی عمید. چ سوم، تهران: امیرکبیر.

کاتوزیان، امیرناصر (1369). وصیت در حقوق مدنی ایران. چ دوم، تهران: یلدا.

کریمی، عباس (۱۳۸۷). جزوۀ درسی حقوق مدنی۲ و تقریرات کلاسی. تهران: دانشگاه تهران.

کریمی، عباس؛ کریمی، سحر (۱۴۰۱). اندیشه‌هایی نو در حقوق قراردادها. چ دوم، تهران: دادگستر.

کریمی، عباس؛ کریمی، سحر (۱۳۹۱). تبیین ماهیت ادلۀ الکترونیکی از دیدگاه نظام سنتی ادلۀ اثبات دعوا. ارج‌نامۀ دکتر الماسی، تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.

کریمی، عباس؛ کریمی، سحر (۱۳۹۳). تعارض بین مالیت بالفعل و شخصیت بالقوۀ جنین آزمایشگاهی. فصلنامۀ حقوق پزشکی، ۸(۳۰).

محقق حلی، جعفربن الحسن (1403ق). شرایع‌الاسلام. ج۲، تهران: نشر استقلال.

معین، محمد (1360). فرهنگ فارسی معین. ج۴، تهران: امیرکبیر.

نخجوانی، علی؛ یاقوتی، ابراهیم (1401). وضعیت حقوقی معاملات انجام‌شده توسط هوش مصنوعی: نظریۀ وکیل مجازی. پژوهش‌های حقوق اقتصادی و تجاری، 1(1)، DOI:https://doi.org/10.48308/eclr.2023.103363،

نخجوانی، علی (1401). محدودیت‌های پلتفرم‌های دیجیتال در قانون بازار دیجیتال اتحادیۀ اروپا. پژوهش‌های حقوقی، DOI:10.48300/jlr.2022.374563.2216،

References

Amid, H. (1990). Amid Persian Dictionary. 3rd ed. Tehran: Amirkabir.[in Persian]

Amin, S. A. (2021). An Introduction to the Legal Personality Theory in Imamiyyah Jurisprudence. Legal Civilization 4(9). https://www.pzhfars.ir/article_141396.html?lang=fa. .[in Persian]

Azimi, M., & Agrawl, A. (2019). Is Positive Sentiment in Corporate Annual Reports Informative? Evidence from Deep Learning.

Banteka, N. (2021). Artificially Intelligent Persons. Housten Law Rev, 58(3), 537-596.

Bartram, S., & Branke, J., & Motahari, M. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Asset Management. CFA Institute Research Foundation.

Bayern, S. (2017). The Implications of Modern Business-Entity Law for the Regulation of Autonomous Systems. Stanford Technology Law Review, 19(93), 93-112.

Bertolini, A., & Episcopo, F. (2022). Robots and AI as Legal Subjects Disentangling the Ontological and Functional Perspective. Front Robots AI, Vol.9, DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.842213.

Bryson, J. (2010). Robots Should Be Slaves. Close Engagements with Artificial Companion.

Chopra, S., & White Laurence (2011). A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents. University of Michigan Press, 1-17.

Christof, H. (2013). Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, Summary of arbitrary executions. Human Rights Council, 23Session. A/HRC/23/47.

Corrales, M. C., Fenwick, M., and Forgó, N. (2018). Robotics, AI and the Future of Law. Springer Singapore.

Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador.

Cuthbertson, A. (2017). Artificial Intelligence “Boy” Shibuya Mirai Becomes World's First AI Bot to Be Granted Residency. Newsweek.

Dadmarzi, S. M. (2015). Feasibility of Recognizing the Legal Personality of the Family in Iranian, Islamic, Western Law and Islamic Jurisprudence. Comparative Legal Research 19(3). https://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-1668-fa.html. .[in Persian]

Delaney. KJ. (2017). The Robot that Takes Your Job Should Pay Taxes, Says Bill Gates’ Quartz. https://qz.com/911968/bill-gates-the-robot-that-takes-your-job-should-pay-taxes.

Dewey, J. (1926).The Historic Background of Corporate Legal Personality, Yale Law Journal, 6.

European Commission (2021). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. Brussels.

European Parliament Resolution (16/February/2017) with Recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)) (2018/C-252/25).

European Parliament, Resolution on a Civil Liability Regime for Artificial Intelligence, (2020/2014(INL)).

Floridi, L., & Sanders, JW. (2004). On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Mind Mach 14.

Future of life (2023). Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter. Halī, Ibn Idrīs. Al-Sarāʾir. Vol. 6. Qom, 1410 AH. [in Arabic]

Ja‘fari-Langarudi, M. J. (2022). Terminology of Law. 36th ed. Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh. [in Persian]

Ja‘fari-Langarudi, M. J. (2017). Wasiyyah (Testament). Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh. [in Persian]

Joizil Karine & Goldenberg Adam & Ghaly Sherry (2022). Could AI get you sued? Artificial Intelligence and litigation risk. Lexology.

Karimi, A., & Karimi, S. (2014). Conflict between Actual Property Value and Potential Legal Personality of Laboratory Embryo. Medical Law Quarterly 8(30). [in Persian]

Karimi, A., & Karimi, S. (2013). Explaining the Nature of Electronic Evidence from the Perspective of Traditional Systems of Evidence. In Festschrift in Honor of Dr. Almasi. Tehran: Sherkat Sahami Enteshar. [in Persian]

Karimi, A., & Karimi, S. (2022). New Thoughts in the Law of Contracts. 2nd ed. Tehran: Dadgostar. [in Persian]

Karimi, A. (2008). Civil Law II: Class Notes and Lectures. Tehran: University of Tehran. [in Persian]

Katouzian, A. N. (1990). Testament in Iranian Civil Law. 2nd ed. Tehran: Yalda. [in Persian]

King Brett & Hammond Tyler & Harrington Jake (2017). Disruptive Technology: Economic Consequences of Artificial Intelligence and the Robotics Revolution. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 12(2), 53-67.

Kurki, V. (2019). a Theory of Legal Personhood. Oxford Academic, Chapter 6, 175-190.

Lawrence B Solum (1992) “Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences. North Carolina Law Review, 70.

List, C. (2021). Group Agency and Artificial Intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, 34, 1213-1242.

Mady, D. (2017). Report with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics. Committee on Legal Affairs. (2015/2103(INL)).

Mele Alfred (2001) “Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy, Oxford Uni Press.

Moein, M.(1981). Moein Persian Dictionary. Vol. 4. Tehran: Amirkabir. [in Persian]

Mohaghegh-Helli, Jaʿfar ibn al-Hasan. (1983). Sharāʾiʿ al-Islām. Vol. 2. Tehran: Esteqlal. [in Arabic]

Nakhjavani, A., & Yaghoubi, E. (2022).“egal Status of Transactions Executed by Artificial Intelligence: Virtual Attorney Theory. Economic and Commercial Law Research 1(1). https://ecocomlaw.sbu.ac.ir/article_103363.html. [in Persian]

Nakhjavani, A. (2022). Limitations of Digital Platforms under the EU Digital Markets Act. Legal Research. https://jlr.sdil.ac.ir/article_164158.html?lang=fa. [in Persian]

Negri, A. (2021). Robots as Legal Person: Electronic Personhood in Robotic and Artificial Intelligence. Front Robot and AI, (8), DOI:10.3389/frobt.2021.789327.

Nelson, J. (2023). Chat GPT Wrongly Accuses Law Professor of Sexual Assault. Decrypt, https://decrypt.co/125712/chatgpt-wrongly-accuses-law-professor-sexual-assault.

Novelli, C. (2022). Legal personhood for the Integration of AI Systems in the Social Context: A Study Hypothesis. AI Soc.

Parviainen, J., & Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). The Political Choreography of the Sophia Robot: Beyond Robot Rights and Citizenship to Political Performances for the Social Robotics Market. AI & SOCIETY, 36, P.p.715-724.

Pasban, M. (2022). Commercial Law: Legal Persons and Commercial Companies. Vol. 2. Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh, [in Persian]

Prodhan (2017). European Parliament Calls for Robot Law, Rejects Robot Tax.

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council (2021). Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (AI Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM/2021/206 final. Brussels. Article 3 (Definitions), R1.

Rahbar, N., & Dehghanpour Farashah, S. (2021). A Comparative Study on the Basis of Civil Liability in Autonomous Vehicle Accidents. Comparative Law Review 12(2). https://jcl.ut.ac.ir/article_85233.html?lang=fa. [in Persian]

Raskulla, S. (2023). Hybrid Theory of Corporate Legal Personhood and Its Application to Artificial Intelligence. Springer Nature, (3), Article Num.78, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43545-023-00667-x.

Schirmbacher, M., & Rechtsanwälte, H. (2020). Insight on Public Policies to Ensure AI’s Beneficial Use as a Professional Tool. IBA Alternative & New Bus. Structures Committee.

Shahid Awwal (2015). Al-Lumʿa al-Dimashqiyya. Translated by Shirvani, Ali and Gharavian, Mohsen. Vol. 1. 53rd ed. Qom: Dar al-Fikr,. [in Arabic]

Sharifi, S. E., & Biryami, G. (2018). Legal Nature of Intelligent Agents in Electronic Contracts. Legal Research 17(33). https://jlr.sdil.ac.ir/article_65509.html. [in Persian]

Supreme Court of India, Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee, Amritsar V Shri Somnath, Dass AIR 2000 SC 1421.

Tabatabaei Yazdi, S. M. K. (2020). Supplements to Urwat al-Wuthqa. Vol. 2. Maktabat al-Dawari. (in Arabic)

Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017 (New Zealand).

Tuhin Das Mahapatra (2023). AI-Controlled Drone Turns on Operator in a Shocking Simulated Test, Highlights Ethical Concerns. Hindustan Times, https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/aicontrolled-drone-turns-on-operator-in-a-shocking-simulated-test-highlights-ethical-concerns-101685673578548.html.

U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (2020). Staff Report on Algorithmic Trading in U.S. Capital Markets.

UNESCO (2023). AI and the Rule of Law: Capacity Building for Judicial Systems. Artificial Intelligence and the Rule of Law.

Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (2006).

University of Helsinki (2019). Can Artificial Intelligence Be Sued? Who Is Responsible When AI Makes the Decisions?. Yliopisto magazine, https://www.helsinki.fi/en/news/economics/can-artificial-intelligence-be-sued-who-responsible-when-ai-makes-decisions.

Winshel, A. (2023). Authors File Complaint Against OpenAI for Copyright Infringement. Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law, Harvard Law School,https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jsel/2023/07/authors-file-complaint-against-openai-for-copyright-infringement/.