تحلیل حقوقی ضابطۀ تسهیم در پرونده‌های نقض حق اختراع ایالات متحدۀ آمریکا و قابلیت اعمال آن در حقوق ایران

منابع

افراسیاب، محبوب (1400). مالکیت صنعتی در نظام حقوقی ایران با تأکید بر رویۀ قضایی (علامت تجاری، طرح صنعتی، اختراع). تهران: علم و دانش.

جعفرزاده، میرقاسم؛ پاک زمان، امید (1399). حق امتیاز متعارف به‌مثابۀ رایج‌ترین ضابطۀ تقویم خسارت در دعاوی نقض حق اختراع در رویۀ قضایی آمریکا و ارزیابی اعمال آن در نظام حقوقی ایران. تحقیقات حقوقی، 23(92)، 121-146، 10.22034/jlr.2020.184747.1560

جعفرزاده، میرقاسم، و حاجی‌زاده، سارا. (1394). سوءاستفاده از اختراع توسط محتکران حق اختراع. پژوهش‌های حقوق تطبیقی، 19(4)، 25 – 48. در:

http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-3517fa.html(19 مرداد 1404)

حبیبا، سعید؛ حسین‌زاده، مجید (1397). تحلیل حقوقی ضرر اقتصادی ناشی از نقض اختراع و فرایند ارزش‌گذاری آن. فصلنامۀ مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، 50(4)، 665-685. DOI:10.22059/jlq.2021.272193.1007146

روحی‌زاده، علی؛ عباس‌تبار، مجید (1396). رأی اعلامی پیشگیرانه و حمایت از ناقضان بالقوۀ حق اختراع. دوفصلنامۀ دیدگاه‌های حقوق قضایی، (77 و 78)، 113-131. https://jlviews.ujsas.ac.ir/article_703502_dc7b706b0f9eb65e0dae769344b5a099.pdf، (19 مرداد 1404)

عیسائی تفرشی، محمد؛ صادقی، محمود؛ شاه‌محمدی، محمد (1391). بررسی اجرت‌المثل به‌عنوان ضابطۀ جبران خسارت ناشی از نقض حق اختراع و مطالعۀ تطبیقی با حق‌الامتیاز متعارف در حقوق آمریکا. مجلۀ حقوقی دادگستری، 148-175.

  https://doi.org/10.22106/jlj.2012.11058

عیسائی تفرشی، محمد؛ صادقی، محمود؛ شاه‌محمدی، محمد (1390). تفویت منفعت مالک ضابطه‌ای برای جبران خسارت ناشی از نقض حق اختراع در حقوق ایران و آمریکا. پژوهش‌های حقوق تطبیقی، 15(3) (پیاپی ۷۳)، 112-122. https://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-4157-fa.html، (19 مرداد 1404)

References

Afrasiab, M. (2021). Industrial Property in the Iranian Legal System with Emphasis on Judicial, Practice (Trademark, Industrial Design, Patent). Tehran: Elm va Danesh. [in Persian]

Amundson, S. M. (2014). Apportionment and the Entire Market Value Rule Have Presented Problems in Practice When Determining the Value of a Patented Invention. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 23(1), 1-23. https://tiplj.org/wp-content/uploads/Volumes/v23/Amundson_formatting.pdf, ( accessed 10 August 2025)

Bailey, E. M., Leonard, G. K., & Lopez, M. A. (2011).). Making Sense of Apportionment in Patent Damages. The Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, p.255-271, available at www.stlr.org,.

    (accessed 10 August 2025)

Bensen, E. E., & White, D. M, (2008). Using Apportionment to Rein in the Georgia-Pacific Factors. The Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, 1-40, available on: www.stlr.org. ( accessed 10 August 2025)

Bensen, E. (2017). Brief of Amicus Curiae Intellectual Property Law Scholar in Support of Petitioners . www.supremecourt.gov, 1-10. ( accessed 10 August 2025)

Bilicska, C. (2016). Negotiating a Reasonable Royalty in a Patent Licensing Setting. 1-8, available at: https://law.shu.edu/documents/gibbons-iplicensing-negotiating-royalty.pdf, . ( accessed 10 August 2025)

Friedman, J. (2012). Apportionment: Shining the Light of Day on Patent Damages. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 63(1), 145-187, Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol63/iss1/12,   (accessed 10 August 2025)

Geradin, D., & Layne-Farrar, A. (2011). Patent Value Apportionment Rules for Complex, Multi-patent Products . Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, 27(4), 762-792,

https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1528&context=chtlj, ( accessed 10 August 2025)

Golden, J. (2019). Discretion in Patent Damages,  1-31, available on: https://law.utexas.edu/faculty/publications/2019-discretion-in-patent-damages/, (accessed 10 August 2025)

Habiba, Saeed, Majid, Hosseinzadeh (2018). “Legal Analysis of Economic Loss Resulting from Patent, Infringement and Its Valuation Process,” Quarterly Journal of Private Law Studies, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 665-, 685. doi:10.22059/jlq.2021.272193.1007146 [in Persian]

saee-Tafreshi, M., , Sadeghi, A., & Shahmohammadi, M. (2011). Loss of Owner’s, Benefit as a Criterion for Compensating Damages Arising from Patent Infringement in Iranian and U.S. Law. Comparative Legal Studies, 15(3), 112-122. Available at: http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-4157-fa.html (Accessed 9 August 2025) [in Persian]

Isaee-Tafreshi, M., Sadeghi, M., & Shahmohammadi, M. (2012). Examining Reasonable Royalty as a Criterion for Compensating Patent Infringement Damages and Comparative Study with Customary Royalty in U.S. Law. Judiciary Law Journal, 148-175, doi:10.22106/jlj.2012.11058 [in Persian]

Intellectual Property Owners Association (2018). Apportionment in Determining Reasonable Royalty Damages: Legal Principles, Practical Considerations, and Countervailing Viewpoints. 1-41, available at: https://ipo.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Damages-committee-white-paper-1.pdf,. ( accessed 10 August 2025)

Jafarzadeh, M., Pakzaman, O. (2020). Reasonable Royalty as the Most Common Criterion for Damage Assessment in Patent Infringement Cases in U.S. Judicial Practice and Its Application in the Iranian Legal System. Legal Research, 23(92), 121-146. doi:10.22034/jlr.2020.184747.1560 [in Persian]

Jafarzadeh, Mirghasem, Hajizadeh, S. (2015). Patent Misuse by Patent Right Hoarders. Comparative, Legal Studies, 19(4)(2), 25-48. Available at: http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-3517-fa.html, (Accessed 9 August 2025) [in Persian]

Layne-Farrar, A. (2018). The Patent Damage Gap: An Economist’s Review of U.S. Statutory Patent Damages Apportionment Rules. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 31-50, Vol. 26:031. https://tiplj.org/wp-content/uploads/Volumes/v26/Layne-Farrar.pdf,     ( accessed 10 August 2025)

Lee, W. F., & Lemley, M. A(2024). "The Broken Balance: How Built-In Apportionment and the Failure to Apply Daubert Have Distorted Patent Infringement Damages . 1-74, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 37(2).https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/assets/articlePDFs/v372/1-The-Broken-Balance_-How-%E2%80%9CBuilt-in-Apportionment%E2%80%9D-and-the-Failure-to-Apply-Daubert-Have-Distorted-Patent-Infringement-Damages.pdf, ( accessed 10 August 2025)

Lee, W. F., Fleming, M. C., Fletcher, L. B., & Dodge, C. D. (2019). "Brief for Intel Corporation as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners," pp.1-23 www.supremecourt.gov, , ( accessed 10 August 2025)

Opderbeck, D. (2009). Patent Damages Reform and the Shape of Patent Law. Boston University Review, 89(127), 126-187. https://www.bu.edu/law/journals-archive/bulr/volume89n1/documents/OPDERBECK.pdf, ( accessed 10 August 2025)

Rouhizadeh, A., & Abbastabar, M. (2017). Declaratory Judgment and Protection of Potential Patent Infringers. Judicial Perspectives, (77 & 78), 113-131. Available at: https://jlviews.ujsas.ac.ir/article_703502_dc7b706b0f9eb65e0dae769344b5a099.pdf (Accessed 9 August 2025) [in Persian]

Samuelson, Pamela, , John M, Golden, Mark P, Gergen, (2020). "Recalibrating the Disgorgement Remedy in Intellectual Property Cases," Boston University Law Review, p.p.101-187, Vol. 100: PPP. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3529750, (accessed 10 August 2025)

Voth, Drew, Brian C, Park, Nathan C, Brunette (2013). Intellectual Property Value: Where Economic Theory Meets Legal Practices. 72-91, available at: www.fedbar.org,. (accessed 10 August 2025)

Wiggins, M.L. (2010). Patent Reform and Damages Apportionment: Addressing the Concerns of Industry-Scale Users of the U.S. Patent System Without Legislatively Mandating a Specific Contribution over the Prior Art. 273-310, Seton Hall Law Review, Vol. 40:27, https://scholarship.shu.edu/shlr/vol40/iss1/8/, ( accessed 10 August 2025)